PENGARUH PROFITABILITAS, ASSET QUALITY, CAPITAL STRUCTURE DAN MARKET RESPONSE TERHADAP KOMPENSASI EKSEKUTIF SEKTOR PERBANKAN YANG TERDAFTAR DI BURSA EFEK INDONESIA TAHUN 2015-2019
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.35384/jamie.v2i1.554Keywords:
Agency Theory, executive compensation, profitability, asset quality, capital structure, market responseAbstract
The purpose of this research is to determine the impact of profitability, asset quality,capital structure and market response on executive compensation of 33 banks sector in Indonesia Stock Exchange period 2015 -2019. Financial Performance of banks used in this study is Profitability measured by Return On Asset (ROA), Asset quality measured by Non Performing Loan (NPL), capital structure measured by Capital Adequacy Ratio (CAR), and Market Response measured by Price Earning Ratio (PER). The result of this study showed that Profitability (ROA) has a positive significant to executive compensation, Asset quality (NPL) and Capital structure (CAR) has no significant effect on executive compensation. While market response (PER) has a negative significant to executive compensation.References
Akbar, Taufiq. 2019. “Kajian Kinerja Profitabilitas Bank Pada Perspektif Bank Umum Berdasarkan Kegiatan Usaha.” (July): 81.
Ayadi, Nesrine, and Younès Boujèlbène. 2013. “The Influence of the Board of Directors on the Executive Compensation in the Banking Industry.” Global Business & Management Research 5(2): 83–90.
Buachoom, Wonlop. 2017. “Simultaneous Relationship between Performance and Executive Compensation of Thai Non-Financial Firms.” Asian Review of Accounting 25(3): 404–23.
Demirer, Ilhan, and Jingxue (Jessica) Yuan. 2013. “Executive Compensation Structure and Firm Performance in the U.S. Restaurant Industry: An Agency Theory Approach.” Journal of Foodservice Business Research 16(5): 421–38.
Elsayed, Nader, and Hany Elbardan. 2018. “Investigating the Associations between Executive Compensation and Firm Performance: Agency Theory or Tournament Theory.” Journal of Applied Accounting Research 19(2): 245–70.
Khasanah, I. 2015. “Pengaruh Kompensasi Manajemen Eksekutif Terhadap Kinerja Keuangan Perusahaan.” Jurnal Akuntansi UNESA 20(1): 25–44.
Kristanto, Jennifer Caroline. 2016. “KINERJA PERUSAHAAN TERHADAP KOMPENSASI EKSEKUTIF PADA PERUSAHAAN YANG TERDAFTAR DI INDEKS LQ 45 PERIODE 2012- 2016.” 5(1): 1–12.
Mardiyati, Umi, Monica Shinta Devi, and Suherman. 2013. “Pengaruh Kinerja Perusahaan, Corporate Governance , Dan Shareholder Payout Terhadap Kompensasi Eksekutif (The Impact of Firms Performance, Corporate Governance, and Shareholder Payout on Executives Compensation).” Jurnal Riset Manajemen Sains Indonesia (JRMSI) 4(2): 167–83. http://journal.unj.ac.id/unj/index.php/jrmsi/article/view/784.
Omoregie, Osaretin Kayode, and Ikechukwu Kelikume. 2017. “Executive Compensation And Banking Sector Performance: Evidence From Nigeria.” The Journal of Developing Areas 51(2): 1–15.
Prasanti, Tyas Ayu, Triastuti Wuryandari, and Agus Rusgiyono. 2015. “Aplikasi Regresi Data Panel Untuk Pemodelan Tingkat Pengangguran Terbuka Kabupaten/Kota Di Provinsi Jawa Tengah.” Jurnal Gaussian 4(3): 687–96.
Puspasari, Adelia Yuhana, and Devi Farah Azizah. 2017. “KEBIJAKAN KREDIT YANG EFEKTIF UNTUK MENURUNKAN NPL (NON PERFORMING LOAN) DAN MENINGKATKAN PROFITABILITAS ( Studi Pada BPR Agro Cipta Adiguna Pare ).” 44(1): 70–75.
Puspasari, Dian. 2015. “Pengaruh Kompensasi Eksekutif Dan Efisiensi Operasional Terhadap Kinerja Keuangan Pada Sektor Perbankan Yang Terdaftar Di Bursa Efek Indonesia.”
Rasoava, Rijamampianina. 2019. “Executive Compensation and Firm Performance: A Non-Linear Relationship.” Problems and Perspectives in Management 17(2): 1–17.
Rr Diana Atika Ghozali, Fuad. 2019. “Pengaruh Struktur Kepemilikan, Kinerja, Dan Risiko Terhadap Kompensasi Eksekutif.” Parameter 4(2): 1–10.
Saerang, Ivonne, Parengkuan Tommy, and Mario Christiano. 2014. “Analisis Terhadap Rasio-Rasio Keuangan Untuk Mengukur Profitabilitas Pada Bank-Bank Swasta Yang Go Public Di Bursa Efek Indonesia.” Jurnal Riset Ekonomi, Manajemen, Bisnis dan Akuntansi 2(4): 817–30.
Sari, Santi Puspita, and Puji Harto. 2014. “KOMPENSASI EKSEKUTIF DAN KINERJA OPERASIONAL PERBANKAN INDONESIA.” 03: 1–7.
Sintha, Lis. 2014. “Analisis Capital Adequacy Ratio (CAR), Non Performing Loan (NPL), BOPO, Return On Asset (ROA) Dan Net Interest Margin (NIM) Terhadap Loan to Deposit Ratio (LDR) Pada Industri Perbankan.” Jurnal Keuangan dan Perbankan 2(3): 21–27.
Sochib, 2016. 2016. “Pengaruh Capital Adequacy Ratio, Debt To Equity Ratio, Rasio Biaya Operasional Pendapatan Operasional Dan Loan To Deposit Ratio Terhadap Kinerja Keuangan Bank Umum Swasta Nasional Yang Go Public Di Bursa Efek Indonesia.” Jurnal Penelitian Ilmu Ekonomi WIGA 6(1): 1–14.
Wicaksono, K. Y. 2017. “Pengaruh Kinerja Perusahaan Dan Ukuran Perusahaan Terhadap Kompensasi Eksekutif.” Jurnal Akuntansi dan Keuangan Indonesia 12(1): 19–36. widjayanti, Rina Eka. 2017. “Bunga Rampai.” : 125.
Yamina, Amarou, and Bensaid Mohamed. 2017. “The Impact of Firm Performance on Executive Compensation in France.” Mediterranean Journal of Social Sciences 8(2): 63–69.
Yang, Bank et al. 2011. “PENGARUH CAPITAL ADEQUACY RATIO , NON PERFORMING LOAN, UKURAN PERUSAHAAN DAN STRUKTUR KEPEMILIKAN TERHADAP PROFITABILITAS dihitung Dengan Menggunakan Return on Assets (ROA), Capital Adequacy Ratio Menunjukkan Rasio Kecukupan Modal Bank Dalam Menjalankan.” : 1–17.
Zamzami, Rahman. 2011. “PENGARUH KINERJA KEUANGAN TERHADAP PRICE EARNING RATIO (Studi Pada Perusahaan Yang Tercatat Dalam Indeks LQ 45).”
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Journal of Accounting, Management and Islamic Economics
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Abstract Views: 0
| 
File Downloads: 0