The Role of Moderation in The Company's Age on Financial Slack's Relationship to Company Performance
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.35384/jime.v15i1.297Keywords:
financial slack, firm performance, firm size, firm ageAbstract
This study examines whether financial slack is associated with firm performance and whether this relation-ship is moderated by firm size and firm age. This study consists of 251 firm-years covering the period from 2017to 2019 of 85 companies in the manufacturing industry listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange (IDX). Our findings indicate that financial slack has a negative effect on company performance. This negative ef-fect is weakened if the size of the company is larger and the age of the company is more mature. In addi-tion, companies with financial slack tend not to use the slack of company financial resources for the benefit of the company. This can be attributed to the tendency of the company's management to use these re-sources to increase additional income or remuneration for managers. The management considers the com-pany's short-term performance which has an impact on increasing management's welfare. These findings emphasize that big size companies will compete with younger companies that tend to invest in research and development. Therefore, large companies will use financial slack for the benefit of the company in or-der to maintain the company's survival in the future. Mature companies have experience in managing com-pany resources and competence in gaining access to the resources needed to survive or grow. Therefore, based on experience and journey to gain access to funding, financial slack will be used for the benefit of the company. This study supports the prediction with evidence from Indonesia manufacture companies, and conclude that financial slack will be managed in aim maintain access to funding in the future.Downloads
References
Ashraf, N., Comyns, B., Tariq, S., & Chaudhry, H. R. (2020). Carbon performance of firms in developing countries: The role of financial slack, carbon prices and dense network. Jour-nal of Cleaner Production, 253, 119846. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.119846
Barney, J. (1991). Firm Resources and Sustained Competitive Advantage. Journal of Manage-ment, 17(1), 99–120. https://doi.org/10.1177/014920639101700108
Bharadwaj, A. S. (2000). A Resource-Based Per-spective on Information Technology Capabil-ity and Firm Performance: An Empirical In-vestigation. MIS Quarterly, 24(1), 169–196.
Bibi, S., Khan, A., Qian, H., Garavelli, A. C., Na-talicchio, A., & Capolupo, P. (2020). Innova-tive climate, a determinant of competitive-ness and business performance in chinese law firms: The role of firm size and age. Sustain-ability (Switzerland), 12(12), 1–24. https://doi.org/10.3390/SU12124948
Boso, N., Danso, A., Leonidou, C., Uddin, M., Adeola, O., & Hultman, M. (2017). Does fi-nancial resource slack drive sustainability expenditure in developing economy small and medium-sized enterprises? Journal of Business Research, 80, 247–256. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2017.06.016
Bourgeois, L. J. (1981). On the Measurement of Organizational Slack. Academy of Manage-ment Review, 6(1), 29–39. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1981.4287985
Chipeta, C., & Nkiwane, P. (2020). Financial slack, method of payment and acquirer perfor-mance: The case of cross-border acquisitions into Africa. Investment Analysts Journal, 49(2), 92–104. https://doi.org/10.1080/10293523.2020.1755817
Church, B. K., Kuang, X. (Jason), & Liu, Y. (Sarah). (2019). The effects of measurement basis and slack benefits on honesty in budget reporting. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 72, 74–84. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aos.2018.05.005
Coad, A., Segarra, A., & Teruel, M. (2016). Inno-vation and firm growth: Does firm age play a role? Research Policy, 45(2), 387–400. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2015.10.015
Cruz, A. M., & Haugan, G. L. (2019). Determi-nants of maintenance performance: A re-source-based view and agency theory ap-proach. Journal of Engineering and Technol-ogy Management - JET-M, 51(August 2016), 33–47. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jengtecman.2019.03.001
Daniel, F., Lohrke, F. T., Fornaciari, C. J., & Turner, R. A. (2004). Slack resources and firm performance: A meta-analysis. Journal of Business Research, 57(6), 565–574. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0148-2963(02)00439-3
Fort, T. C., Haltiwanger, J., Jarmin, R. S., & Miran-da, J. (2013). How firms respond to business cycles: The role of firm age and firm size. IMF Economic Review, 61(3), 520–559. https://doi.org/10.1057/imfer.2013.15
Greve, H. R. (2003). A behavioral theory of R&D expenditures and innovations: Evidence from shipbuilding. Academy of Management Jour-nal, 46(6), 685–702. https://doi.org/10.2307/30040661
Guo, F., Zou, B., Zhang, X., Bo, Q., & Li, K. (2020). Financial slack and firm performance of SMMEs in China: Moderating effects of government subsidies and market-supporting institutions. International Journal of Produc-tion Economics, 223(October), 107530. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2019.107530
Jensen, M. C., & Meckling, W. H. (2019). Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure. Corporate Governance: Values, Ethics and Leadership, 77–132. https://doi.org/10.4159/9780674274051-006
Kraatz, M. S., & Zajac, E. J. (2001). How Organi-zational Resources Affect Strategic Change and Performance in Turbulent Environments: Theory and Evidence. Organization Science, 12(5), 632–657. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.12.5.632.10088
Latan, H., Chiappetta Jabbour, C. J., Lopes de Sou-sa Jabbour, A. B., de Camargo Fiorini, P., & Foropon, C. (2020). Innovative efforts of ISO 9001-certified manufacturing firms: Evidence of links between determinants of innovation, continuous innovation and firm performance. International Journal of Production Econom-ics, 223. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2019.107526
Ling, Y., Zhao, H., & Baron, R. A. (2007). Influ-ence of Founder—CEOs’ Personal Values on Firm Performance: Moderating Effects of Firm Age and Size†. Journal of Management, 33(5), 673–696. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206307305564
Lin-Hua Lu, & Poh-Kam, W. (2019). Performance feedback, financial slack and the innovation behavior of firms. Asia Pacific Journal of Management.
Mallinguh, E., Wasike, C., & Zoltan, Z. (2020). The business sector, firm age, and perfor-mance: the mediating role of foreign owner-ship and financial leverage. International Journal of Financial Studies, 8(4), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijfs8040079
Mattingly, J. E., & Olsen, L. (2018). Performance Outcomes of Investing Slack Resources in Corporate Social Responsibility. Journal of Leadership and Organizational Studies, 25(4), 481–498. https://doi.org/10.1177/1548051818762336
Meyer, A. D. (1982). Adapting to environmental jolts. Administrative Science Quarterly, 27(4), 515–537. https://doi.org/10.2307/2392528
Mishra, B. K., Rolland, E., Satpathy, A., & Moore, M. (2019). A framework for enterprise risk identification and management: the resource-based view. Managerial Auditing Journal, 34(2), 162–188. https://doi.org/10.1108/MAJ-12-2017-1751
Nohria, N., & Gulati, R. (1996). Is Slack Good or Bad for Innovation? Academy of Manage-ment Journal, 39(5), 1245–1264. https://doi.org/10.5465/256998
Panda, B., & Leepsa, N. M. (2017). Agency theory: Review of theory and evidence on problems and perspectives. Indian Journal of Corpo-rate Governance, 10(1), 74–95. https://doi.org/10.1177/0974686217701467
Pepper, A., & Gore, J. (2015). Behavioral Agency Theory: New Foundations for Theorizing About Executive Compensation. Journal of Management, 41(4), 1045–1068. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206312461054
Rau, D., Flores, L., & Simha, A. (2020). A moder-ated-mediated examination of the relations among strategic planning, organizational learning, slack and firm performance. Man-agement Decision, 59(9), 2200–2216. https://doi.org/10.1108/MD-02-2020-0171
Shrivastava, M., & Tamvada, J. P. (2019). Which green matters for whom? Greening and firm performance across age and size distribution of firms. Small Business Economics, 52(4), 951–968. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-017-9942-y
Tzouvanas, P., Kizys, R., Chatziantoniou, I., & Sagitova, R. (2020). Environmental and fi-nancial performance in the European manu-facturing sector: An analysis of extreme tail dependency. British Accounting Review, 52(6), 100863. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bar.2019.100863
Verbeke, A., & Yuan, W. (2013). The Drivers of Multinational Enterprise Subsidiary Entrepre-neurship in China: A New Resource-Based View Perspective. Journal of Management Studies, 50(2), 236–258. https://doi.org/10.1111/joms.12001
Younis, H., & Sundarakani, B. (2020). The impact of firm size, firm age and environmental management certification on the relationship between green supply chain practices and corporate performance. Benchmarking, 27(1), 319–346. https://doi.org/10.1108/BIJ-11-2018-0363
Zhang, K., Wang, J. J., Sun, Y., & Hossain, S. (2021). Financial slack, institutional share-holding and enterprise innovation investment: evidence from China. Accounting and Fi-nance, 61(2), 3235–3259. https://doi.org/10.1111/acfi.12700
Zhu, Q., Liu, J., & Lai, K. H. (2016). Corporate social responsibility practices and perfor-mance improvement among Chinese national state-owned enterprises. International Jour-nal of Production Economics, 171, 417–426. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2015.08.005
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
Abstract Views: 147
| 
File Downloads: 94
