Analysis of Factors Contributing to Motivation of Lecturers; The Case of Faculty Communication and Business in Telkom University.
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.35384/jime.v9i1.16Keywords:
Motivasi kerja, Promosi, Tujuan, Dosen TetapAbstract
The purpose of this research is to know the motivation conditions as well as to look at the factors that contributes that dominant factor and contribute to the motivation permanent lectures on Faculty Communication and Business of Telkom University. The research method is descriptive quantitative. The respondent in this study is permanent lectures on Faculty Communication and Business of Telkom University. Factor in this research totaled ten factors, consisting of quality supervision, existence, company policy, a good working place, relationships with co-workers, promotion, growth, recognition, obligations, and goal. Research data obtained from the dissemination of the questionnaire to 70 respondents and study of literature. Analytical using data techniques is descriptive analysis and analysis of the factors. Based on the results of the descriptive analysis, the motivation permanent lectures on the category “good†that amounted to 71%. The results of the analysis of the factors mentioned that promotion factor and goal factor is the factor that formed after the reduction of the ten factors. Promotion factor represented by company policy, recognition, quality supervision, relationships with co-workers, growth, and existence has value loading factor is 0,874. While the goal factor represented by a good working place and obligations has highest value loading factor is 0,924.
Downloads
References
Asep, I. T. (2004). Manajemen Motivasi. Jakarta: PT. Gramedia Widiasarana Indonesia.
Assauri, S. (2008). Manajemen Produksi Dan Operasi. Jakarta: LPFEUI.
Hariandja, M. (2002). Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia. Jakarta: Grasindo.
Hasibuan, M. (2003). Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara.
Hasibuan, M. (2012). Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara.
Heidjrarachman, H. S. (1992). Manajemen Personalia. Yogyakarta: BPFE Universitas Gajah Mada.
Istanto, S. (1994). Hukum Internasional. Yogyakarta: Universitas Atmajaya.
Ivancevich, J. (2010). Human Resource Management. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Luthans, F. (2011). Organizational Behavior, 12th ed. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Manullang, M. (2004). Manajemen Personalia. Yogyakarta: Gadjah Mada University Press.
Mu'in, F. (2011). Pendidikan Karakter : Konstruksi Teoritik dan Praktik. Yogyakarta: Ar-Ruzz Media.
Pangarso, A. (2014). “Motivasi Kerja Dosen Program Studi (Prodi) Administrasi Bisnis (Adbis) Sekolah Administrasi Bisnis dan Keuangan (SABK) Institut Manajemen Telkom (IMTelkom) Bandung.†Jurnal Administrasi Bisnis Vol 2 No. 3 Universitas Diponegoro, Semarang.
Pengertian Daya Pendorong. Dipetik Februari 11, 2016, dari Kabar Pendidikan: www.kabarpendidikan.co.id
Republik Indonesia. (2012). UU No. 12 Tahun 2012 tentang Pendidikan Tinggi. Jakarta: Sekretariat Negara.
Robert Kreitner, A. K. (2014). Perilaku Organisasi. Jakarta: Salemba Empat.
Santoso, S. (2012). Aplikasi SPSS Pada Statistik Multivariat. Jakarta: PT. Elex Media Komputindo.
Siagian, S. P. (2004). Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara.
Siagian, S. P. (2008). Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara.
Siagian, S. P. (2014). Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara.
Simamora, H. (2004). Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia Edisi Ke-3. Yogyakarta: STIE YKPN.
Soemarso. (2009). Akuntansi Suatu Pengantar. Edisi Kelima. Jakarta: Salemba Empat.
Stephen, R. (2015). Perilaku Organisasi. Jakarta: Salemba Empat.
Suliyanto. (2005). Metode Riset Bisnis. Bandung: Alfabeta.
Supranto, J. (2010). Analisis Multivariate Arti & Interpretasi. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.